(Click picture to go back to Table of Contents)
Welcome
Enjoy... But remember
"Don't give in to winning the argument
and losing one of your eternal crowns..."
God bless you...
Enjoy... But remember
"Don't give in to winning the argument
and losing one of your eternal crowns..."
God bless you...
Now refuting your errors
Helping My friend RTC to see. (frank)
Something for Frank (RTC)
How big should one house church grow to, before a new one should be started?
Life decides size (RTC)
Nonsense!!!!
Rebutting your nonsense (RTC)
Refutting your errors!
|
My contention is that the early christians met in few large houses rather than the hundreds of small houses that you're trying to build your house church theory on. ++Substantiate your point with references please. If not then I take it that you are just smoking. Also all letters of the Apostle Paul were written to the Church of that city as he addressed them as singular. ++That was because he saw the church as a united whole, not a fragmented many. And it still does not negate the fact that there are many house churches in one city. He never addressed any house church in particular in any city. The letter Paul wrote to Philemon....is a personal letter to Philemon. Paul just add in greetings to the church in his house that's all. It's not written to address about issues concerning the church meeting in his house. ++The letter to Philemon refutes your point, no matter how you desperately try to belittle it. The fact is that the letter was to be read to the house church too, otherwise why would Paul greet them? Let's see how you try to wriggle out of this one. What has Gauis in John's epistle got to do with the Gauis in Romans? Can't there be more than one Gaius just as there can be more than one Simon or Joseph or James? ++Then prove your case. It can just as well be that they are one and the same. |
to:
Messages
Outline:
RTC doesn't know how to read the Bible!!?!!, 2001, Apr 29
You don't seem to fare any better either by RTC, 2001, Apr 30 
You read the commentary, I read my Bible,, 2001, Apr 30
I read my Bible and my commentary by RTC, 2001, Apr 30
Can misread Bible, can also choose only the commentary you want., 2001, May 01
And that applies to you as well by RTC, 2001, May 02 
The commentary you quoted doesn't even support your housechurch theory., 2001, May 02
Does it not shows RTC blundered,again?n/t, 2001, May 02
You can't even read the commentary properly by RTC, 2001, May 03
Which dumb commentator will tell you that the local church is..., 2001, May 03
Ah so I am vindicated! by RTC, 2001, May 03
Ah so you're still so blind!, 2001, May 03
And yet I see by RTC, 2001, May 04
Can blind man be trusted?, 2001, May 04
Ditto, 2001, May 04
Why not? by RTC, 2001, May 08
Now you're admitting there's teaching by the Apostle Paul in public places,, 2001, May 08
Don't have to admit what I never deny in the first place by RTC, 2001, May 09
Admit you don't even know what you're talking about., 2001, May 09
You will have to do the admission, not me by RTC, 2001, May 09 
Jumbled up theory of the church of today,, 2001, May 09
Yep, it's a big jumbo! by RTC, 2001, May 10
Huh! Those verses doesn't prove a thing of your housechurch theory! , 2001, May 10
If by RTC, 2001, May 10
Confuse theme with activities by RTC, 2001, May 08
Deny whatever they did also in public mass meetings all you want! Kon beh liau lah!, 2001, May 08
Not denial, but proper understanding by RTC, 2001, May 08
to:
Back to Antioch's Home Page