Enjoy... But remember
"Don't give in to winning the argument
and losing one of your eternal crowns..."
|
The New Bible Commentary on the New Testament says this (other commentaries also affirm that the letter of Philemon was to be read to the house church gathered in his home): “Since Philemon was one of those who labored to begin the church at Colosse, it was very natural to have a church meeting in his home. However, it is very unlikely that the entire church at Colosse met in his home. If it did, Paul would have had to address this epistle to all the saints at Colosse. But he already had written a separate epistle to the entire church (the Epistle to the Colossians), which was sent to Colosse with Onesimus and Tychicus at the same time this epistle to Philemon was sent. Thus, it was Paul’s intention that the entire church at Colosse read his larger epistle and that the church meeting at Philemon’s house read this smaller, personal epistle. Since the believers meeting in Philemon’s home would know of Philemon’s affairs—especially concerning Onesimus—it was wise for Paul to include them in this epistle. It would keep them from gossiping, and the church could apply extra pressure on Philemon to meet Paul’s request. At any rate, the church that met in Philemon’s home was a house church, a home meeting (or ecclesia), assembling within the confines of the local church at Colosse. The same kind of meetings are spoken of in Romans 16:5; 1 Corinthians 16:19, 20; Colossians 4:15, 16 (see comments on Rom. 16:5, comments on 1 Cor. 16:19, 20, and on Col. 4:15, 16).” Meng keen, kong tampok eh sai liao. |
to:
Messages
Outline:
You read the commentary, I read my Bible,, 2001, Apr 30
I read my Bible and my commentary by RTC, 2001, Apr 30
Can misread Bible, can also choose only the commentary you want., 2001, May 01
And that applies to you as well by RTC, 2001, May 02
The commentary you quoted doesn't even support your housechurch theory., 2001, May 02
Does it not shows RTC blundered,again?n/t, 2001, May 02
You can't even read the commentary properly by RTC, 2001, May 03
Which dumb commentator will tell you that the local church is..., 2001, May 03
Ah so I am vindicated! by RTC, 2001, May 03
Ah so you're still so blind!, 2001, May 03
And yet I see by RTC, 2001, May 04
Can blind man be trusted?, 2001, May 04
Ditto, 2001, May 04
Why not? by RTC, 2001, May 08
Now you're admitting there's teaching by the Apostle Paul in public places,, 2001, May 08
Don't have to admit what I never deny in the first place by RTC, 2001, May 09
Admit you don't even know what you're talking about., 2001, May 09
You will have to do the admission, not me by RTC, 2001, May 09
Jumbled up theory of the church of today,, 2001, May 09
Yep, it's a big jumbo! by RTC, 2001, May 10
Huh! Those verses doesn't prove a thing of your housechurch theory! , 2001, May 10
If by RTC, 2001, May 10
Confuse theme with activities by RTC, 2001, May 08
Deny whatever they did also in public mass meetings all you want! Kon beh liau lah!, 2001, May 08
Not denial, but proper understanding by RTC, 2001, May 08
to: