Enjoy... But remember
"Don't give in to winning the argument
and losing one of your eternal crowns..."
|
"I can quote any commentary and you can easily dismiss them simply because they seem to support what I am saying."
The commentary you quoted (see below) in this thread doesn't even support the house church theory of yours. The house church was assembling within the confines of the local church at Colosse which can only mean the housechurch in Philemon's house NOT a LOCAL CHURCH in itself. "At any rate, the church that met in Philemon’s home was a house church, a home meeting (or ecclesia), assembling within the confines of the local church at Colosse."
|
to:
Messages
Outline:
Does it not shows RTC blundered,again?n/t, 2001, May 02
You can't even read the commentary properly by RTC, 2001, May 03
Which dumb commentator will tell you that the local church is..., 2001, May 03
Ah so I am vindicated! by RTC, 2001, May 03
Ah so you're still so blind!, 2001, May 03
And yet I see by RTC, 2001, May 04
Can blind man be trusted?, 2001, May 04
Ditto, 2001, May 04
Why not? by RTC, 2001, May 08
Now you're admitting there's teaching by the Apostle Paul in public places,, 2001, May 08
Don't have to admit what I never deny in the first place by RTC, 2001, May 09
Admit you don't even know what you're talking about., 2001, May 09
You will have to do the admission, not me by RTC, 2001, May 09
Jumbled up theory of the church of today,, 2001, May 09
Yep, it's a big jumbo! by RTC, 2001, May 10
Huh! Those verses doesn't prove a thing of your housechurch theory! , 2001, May 10
If by RTC, 2001, May 10
Confuse theme with activities by RTC, 2001, May 08
Deny whatever they did also in public mass meetings all you want! Kon beh liau lah!, 2001, May 08
Not denial, but proper understanding by RTC, 2001, May 08
to: