Apostle Creed cannot be Challenge at all!

HEADER FOR Expressions

(Click picture to go back to Table of Contents)

Welcome

Enjoy... But remember
"Don't give in to winning the argument
and losing one of your eternal crowns..."

God bless you...

Apostle Creed cannot be Challenge at all!

Forum: Theological Expressions
Re:

Sanctissima/ Sono a casa sto avante de spiritus. (Thomas Lim)
Re:

Did Jesus go to Hell? (SK)
Re:

Where is Jesus between his death to ressurection? (Thomas Lim)
Re:

According to John's gospel... (SK)
Re:

Pls explain clearly (Thomas Lim)
Re:

I'm asking for the answer to the question...are you answering or are you conducting a test quiz? :-) (SK)
Re:

No...........=( (Thomas Lim)
Re:

Thanks and some clarification. (SK)
Re:

These scriptures may give you some idea. (True Light)
Re:

The 3 Scriptural Texts (Christopher Yip)
Re:

Who is advocating Extra-Biblicals ? (frankie lee)
Re:

What does it mean that Jesus went to hell in the Apostles' Creed? (Christopher Yip)
Date: 2001, Jul 11
From: frankie lee new

Apostle Creed: All it says is that Christ descended into hell….
Frank: But, according to what [Chris]you say was,” Christ did not descend into Hell”. Can you not notice the big difference? Apostles Creed, are our beliefs which are very fundamental. In such opposing views towards clear Apostle Creed statements, don’t you think something is very wrong? Does it not signify a challenge to God's Truths? Does it not then meant, perhaps the Apostles Creed was wrong?
Chris: If descending into Hades was a necessary part of securing our salvation, then He should have said those words to Mary Magdalene when He resurrected.
Frank:After our Lord's death, descending into Hell had significance far greater than you could comprehend. This knowledge is not easily available, and I think it is quite fair to say Christian may stumble upon this truths. But, we must not deny the Apostle Creed words and sing to the same tune of dubious Theologians, whose agendas are clearly to humiliate and attack Charismatics for reasons out of Unrighteousness. These people, include Hank Hanaagraf…was seen as dishonest by many today with proven witnesses. Can you not notice that these people whose agendas are really from a different source of truths, even denigrating God’s Words?
These people only serve to strengthen the cause of Charismatics by their blatant errors. If they do not blunder on these extremely importance issues, we would have sought their advice. Inadvertantly, they gave creditability to Charismatics.
Apostles Creed declares that Jesus went to Hell. Others tries to add in ,that," whether He went into Hell or not, is insignificance, but the importance of the issue was that Christ Jesus really died." I differ completely.
But to say Jesus did not go to Hell after His death is just plain attack of God's Words, You must made your choices clear.
You say," Jesus should have said those words to Mary when He resurrected." The order of importance or priority of His message to Mary is crucial at this juncture. How and why He said those words, are not left to our guesses. We must not accord importance or anything less, by surmising what He must say or do in order to satisfy our personal urges of clarity.
It is inappropriate to say that Jesus should detail His accounts about His descend into Hell to Mary, even though it was an integral part of His missions, no doubt.
Why then our Lord told Mary not to cling on to Him? Did He not say that He had not ascended up yet? John 20; 17
Later, Jesus even showed to His disciples His nail scarred Hands and Feet. Allowing them to touch, even Thomas.
Regards