(Click picture to go back to Table of Contents)

Welcome

Enjoy... But remember
"Don't give in to winning the argument
and losing one of your eternal crowns..."

God bless you...   

But unfortunately, you are not. 

Forum: Theological Expressions
Re: We need changed hearts, not miracles. (Wahshing)
Re: Why many kept calling myJesus,a false healer,today?
Re: It's time to come back from "Experience" to Scriptures! (Christopher Yip)
Re: All those queries and distortions were refuted long ago!Here's more.
Re: "Refuted"? You mean "rancour", don't you? (Christopher Yip)
Re: I oblige You. (FrankieLee)
Re: And I am STILL waiting ... (Christopher Yip)
Re: Please be open and I assume you are reasonable.1. (FrankieLee)
Date: 2001, Sep 02
From: Christopher Yip CKHY

Frankie, Nolen could not ascertain for sure if the prostatic cancer was cured miraculously or naturally, hence, he reserved judgement on this single case. But for the REST of the cases, none have showed up any supporting proof for Kuhlman. Does it mean that if we are unsure which is the real cause for the cure, whether miraculous healing or natural healing, then it AUTOMATICALLY means miraculous healing? Does it work this way, Frank? So we begin by assuming that any case of healing not medically proven or cannot be proven means it is miraculous? Obviously not, Frank. So we are not sure if a miracle healing has taken place or a natural cure has been effected and while it is OKAY for YOU to assume therefore it is a miraculous healing without giving any evidence, I am WRONG to say the evidence is shaky? And please, Frank, nobody here so far hates Kathryn Kuhlman. Why is it that charismatics, like ROman Catholics, often revert to this sort of argument? Because we doubt the authenticity of modern day faith healers, it means we HATE them and would, if given the opportunity, CRUCIFY all charismatics or faith healers? Why do you feel the need to go that way, Frank? Could it be you GOT NO ARGUMENT AND EVIDENCE? I am inclined to believe that. Still awaiting your "proof"! Christopher

to: "But unfortunately, you are not."

Messages Inline: Outline:

1. Superficial or deep,at a glance? by FrankieLee, 2001, Sep 02

1. Frank and Chris, pls read, thankyou by Emmanuel, 2001, Sep 04

1. Nope. by Christopher Yip, 2001, Sep 04

1. Good Reasoning, Chris, would like to hear from Frank too! eom by Emmanuel, 2001, Sep 05

2. Hi Chris, I have a question for people who cessationists by Royston Ong, 2001, Sep 05

1. On Cessationism by Christopher Yip, 2001, Sep 06

(_ In so saying.... by Royston Ong, 2001, Sep 06

(_ Wrong way by Christopher Yip, 2001, Sep 06

(_ Please correct me if I have not yet figured it out by Royston Ong, 2001, Sep 09

(_ Response by Christopher Yip, 2001, Sep 09

1. Hi Chris by Royston Ong, 2001, Sep 09

1. You still have a few strawman arguments which I rebutted but you are getting there. (eom) by Christopher Yip, 2001, Sep 12

2. Ahhh I see your point now and I wonder whether Frankie can share his by Royston Ong, 2001, Sep 12

3. Save-by-grace gave good response. by FrankieLee, 2001, Sep 12

1. Ok maybe to avoid another Theological debate between you and Chris by Royston Ong, 2001, Sep 12

1. Die hard fans,of the fallacies! by FrankieLee, 2001, Sep 13

(_ Hi Frankie by Royston Ong, 2001, Sep 13

1. Gifts of Healing? by FrankieLee, 2001, Sep 14

2. ONE point ,for clarity first. by FrankieLee, 2001, Sep 14

1. Please get a copy of A Diary of Signs & Wonders by Maria Woodworth-Etter. That book speaks volume. eom by saved-by-grace, 2001, Sep 14

2. From a cessationist named Frankie. by Christopher Yip, 2001, Sep 13

1. Frankielee....this is utter nonsense! (But USA is top priority now) eom by saved-by-grace, 2001, Sep 13

1. Pls do not blame Frankie or Chris, if you wish to blame you can blame me instead by Royston Ong, 2001, Sep 13

1. explanation by saved-by-grace, 2001, Sep 14

2. Glad that you think so! Now, go look at Frankie's responses to mine. Familiar? (eom) by Christopher Yip, 2001, Sep 13

2. Jack Deere knocked down too many fallacies. by FrankieLee, 2001, Sep 14

1. One point to illustrate,Jack Deere says... by FrankieLee, 2001, Sep 14

1. blah blah blah ... in the end, BLANK! Rebut this, Frank. by Christopher Yip, 2001, Sep 15

(_ Chris,it is time you surrender,and be silent. by FrankieLee, 2001, Sep 16

(_ Frank, go enrol yourself for study and stop misleading people with your ill-logic and unbiblical teachings. by Christopher Yip, 2001, Sep 16

2. ... until you BLUR? by Christopher Yip, 2001, Sep 15

3. I retract for the record of Truths. by Frank, 2001, Oct 07

3. This old cessation's views were very wrong. by FrankieLee, 2001, Sep 07

1. I'd rather be submissive then to demand. by Christopher Yip, 2001, Sep 09

1. Submissives in proper perspectives. by FrankieLee, 2001, Sep 09

2. Continue,for right perspectives. by FrankieLee, 2001, Sep 09

3. We can glorify God by our Faith in Him. by FrankieLee, 2001, Sep 09

2. Response by Christopher Yip, 2001, Sep 04

to: "But unfortunately, you are not."

Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998,1999, 2000, 2001 Antioch Networks International. All Rights Reserved.
The Agora Forum is a registered trademark of Antioch Networks International.

Back to Antioch's Home Page
For more information, please send your request to: forumaster@antioch.com.sg.