Enjoy... But remember
"Don't give in to winning the argument
and losing one of your eternal crowns..."
|
He chose to attribute his cure – or remission, as the case may be – to Miss Kuhlman..A prostrate Cancer man,remark.
Frank:It was clear from case studies or analysis from common sense,that it was the man who were thankful to Miss Kulman,for "thinking he was healed,or indeed was well already being the fact that Dr.Nolen seem to implied it was remissions,or some forms of treatment that made him well. If I were " Miss Kulman",on face value,or superficial level I would attribute his wellness to God's touch and miracles ,if he should said that Prostrate Cancers were gone now,and moreover it is after Prayers,and also committing himself to God for this matter." Dr. Nolen's colour became apparent,and inferior remarks betrayed himself.How?Nolen state that Kathryn was in desperate state to attribute such healings to God.Was she in desperate state?Mind you,23 names were provided to him for investigation,and he interviewed them personally. It was the claimed-patient who subjected to his interrogations.There was no desperations at the part of Miss Kulman at all.It was the Healed victims testifying on how they were touch supernaturally and circumstances that led them to believe that they were healed. Dr.Nolen cited an extremely poor case of referance which actually betrayed himself.In other words,Dr. Nolen was testifying that "the miracles were true in Kathrn's meetings". He seem to say that there were Healings,right,...but only not legitimate healings! There was cancers on patients,and now there were vanished.How?He also did not know,and he offer the possibility of Remissions as factors;auto-suggestions and hypnotics as supplement to his findings. Very strange that Hypnosis can led a patient to believe that he was well,and auto suggestion techniques were so powerful;I also would like to learn and master this SKILLS. VERY AMAZINGLY,IF THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE COULD FALL OFF IN A PUBLIC MEETINGS JUST BY LIFTING OF KATHRN'S HANDS,AND THEY WERE HYPNOTIC,TODAY,I WOULD MAKE MORE MONEY THAN DAVID COPPER FIELD. Seemingly it can cause people who have Cancers,and then dissapeared?Is there a possibility that Cancers can dissolved by itself?Especially at short period of times. A "Hospital Oncologist" was reprimanded for failure to diagnose a patient properly.The senior doctor was puzzled on how the "photos"showed no signs of Cancer or lump and yet a schedule were made to operate,or Radiation are to given to such a person. The Junior Doctor rehearse all the correct standard procedures,and findings,and indeed,earlier checks found that:there were cancers"..or even biopsies to confirm the finds. There is no medical reasonings,except our Vocabulary,Miracles of God. Many years ago in Isreal Jesus did many miracles,and healings. Are they true or are they false?Are they hypnotic,or auto suggestions?When one guy tried to arrest Jesus,he fell slain and backwards.Is that hypnotist? James told us to lay hands on the sick,and the prayer of Faith shall save the sick,is it true or is it false?What does anointing oil got to do with healings?Surely it is not scientific at all!James had no knowledge of Medical Science! Jesus also said,that we are to believe first,that we have them,when we pray, before answers can come! "Whatsoever things when you pray, believe that you have them,and you will have them." It is about Faith in God,and about the supernaturals Things of God. Unbeliefs about God's existence,and waver at His presence,will find no favour from Him. We are to encourage people to have Faith in Jesus,and not dissuade them,or cast doubts about God's ability and willingness to heal people.Unless you do not know God, frank
|
to:
Messages
Outline:
Betol Lah!!! Very good insight! by SK, 2001, Sep 02
Be warned...!!!! by John Doe 666, 2001, Sep 03
Are you're suggesting all the past healings crusades are of the Devil? n/t by SA, 2001, Sep 03
John Doe 666 is quite extreme when it comes down to End Times Apostacy, which is why he is quoting these verses by Royston Ong, 2001, Sep 03
Just think. Can Mr '666' be contradicting himself? by SA, 2001, Sep 04
I agree with you tt the Anti-Christ would not oppose the Devil. I just think he is more a messenger of End Time Apostacy by Royston Ong, 2001, Sep 04
Yah lor, just read what he's saying most of the time lah! Hehehe!!! by SA, 2001, Sep 04
some insights by John Doe 666, 2001, Sep 04
On this note, I fully agree with you. by Royston Ong, 2001, Sep 04
Never read the Bible carefully...no Christ in the Old Testament. n/t by SA, 2001, Sep 04
Hi SA, do you really believe there is no Christ in OT? by Royston Ong, 2001, Sep 04
You're wrong by SA, 2001, Sep 06
oh actually i do know that Emmanuel comes from OT. Ü still wondering what we disagreeing over? by Royston Ong, 2001, Sep 06
Let's reason out properly with the help of the Holy Spirit. by SA, 2001, Sep 04
some answer by John Doe 666, 2001, Sep 05
some replies by SA, 2001, Sep 05
some more by SA, 2001, Sep 06
Simple Question For Mr Six Six Six by Emmanuel, 2001, Sep 05
Untitled by John Doe 666, 2001, Sep 07
The woman is UK??? How interesting!! And what is the man-child? n/t. by Interested , 2001, Sep 07
Hmm...You got a point there, let me do some research....eom by Emmanuel, 2001, Sep 04
Quote Book of Zephaniah 2:1-3 , a plea for repentance, Joe (eom) by Emmanuel, 2001, Sep 05
Maybe they should be worshipping Kuhlman instead! ;-) (eom) by Christopher Yip, 2001, Sep 04
to: