Enjoy... But remember
"Don't give in to winning the argument
and losing one of your eternal crowns..."
|
Dear ES, Probably you missed what I am saying about the lost book of Enoch, not saying that "Protestants" Bible is insuffucuent of carrying any weight to any queries out there, the point is, the 66 books your using now is not the actual set of OT contents as it was during the 1st to 2nd century, before scriptures were finally canonized, adding and minusing of books were plenty, I did came across a book named "Enoch", and it spoke of the devil's plot and his dark angels, used by many apostles of the early ages, if you care, use a search engine to locate what is it all about especially you are trying to show us the Doctrine of the Devil. I am not here to debate how many books should there be in the OT, but to stress that no deuterocanonical books are inspired for doctrinal usage, but dogmatic. Shalom, Emmanuel |
to:
Messages
Outline:
if God does not see fit to put the books in the OT... by Eternally Saved, 2001, Nov 07
No, ES by Emmanuel, 2001, Nov 08
Book of Enoch seems to answer my question on Genesis 1:1, Hmmm. EOM by True Light, 2001, Nov 08
Hi Truelight!!!!!! by Emmanuel, 2001, Nov 12
Sorry, the previous message should not have EOM. by True Light, 2001, Nov 12
TL........Thanks! by Emmanuel, 2001, Nov 13
Untitled by Ng, 2001, Nov 29
to: