(Click picture to go back to Table of Contents)

Welcome

Enjoy... But remember
"Don't give in to winning the argument
and losing one of your eternal crowns..."

God bless you...   

PAUL REBUKED PETER FOR WHAT ? 

Forum: Theological Expressions
Re: Response to a message by Brewer's "people"
Re: Adoi, No Need to Paranoia ('Santa' Monica)
Re: reply
Re: af29 said: "I repeat: Catholics do not need proof." (Christopher Yip)
Re: Untitled
Re: SO IS EVERY CHRISTIAN LED BY THE HOLY SPIRIT
Re: Not All Christians Appointed Teachers, Apostles. /nt (Matthew Tan Yew Hock)
Re: All devout followers have the ability to be teachers...it's a choice.......
Re: Only one is appointed the "rock", "key-bearer", "confirmer of the brethen" (Matthew Tan Yew Hock)
Date: 2001, Apr 12
From: <Anonymous>

to: "PAUL REBUKED PETER FOR WHAT ?"

Messages Inline: Outline:

1. Rebuking Peter, Yet Paul Needed His Support and Blessing (Gal 1 and 2) by Matthew Tan Yew Hock, 2001, Apr 13

(_ But Paul Did Not SUBMIT TO PETER'S "AUTHORITY" by Christopher Yip, 2001, Apr 14

to: "PAUL REBUKED PETER FOR WHAT ?"

Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998,1999, 2000, 2001 Antioch Networks International. All Rights Reserved.
The Agora Forum is a registered trademark of Antioch Networks International.

Back to Antioch's Home Page
For more information, please send your request to: forumaster@antioch.com.sg.