HEADER FOR MessageBoard II
(Click picture to go back to Table of Contents)

Welcome to Messageboard II

Agora Messageboard now functions as a quorum. Please click to join as a member. We want to hear from you... A query that needs an answer, a word to uplift the people, a statement of concern that needs prayer, a cry for help...

  God bless you...

Previous Messageboard have been archived.   tell your friends

Next-in-Thread Next Message

None Salvation & works 

Forum: Messageboard
Re: Question Getting into the "Secrets of the Vine" (Ivan)
Date: 2001, Oct 27
From: LBS

Based on previous debate on salvation and works, below are the views of 4 persons engaged in the discussion. I have also drawn conclusions on their views in relation to each other. If it is inaccurate reflection of your stand, please clarify. Hopefully this will help in further discussion.


Ivan’s stand

Salvation is based on the finished work of Christ on Calvary. PERIOD. No one will quarrel with that; ONLY the devil will.

If you are a true believer you will and must bear fruit. If you are not bearing fruit and continue to practise sin, you are not part of Christ and have to be taken away and thrown away, withered and be burned (Jn 15:2,6).


Chris’

If you had believed with all your heart that Jesus is God and that He died for your sins, Jesus says you are already saved. Period. And to arrive at this state, your heart must have been regenerated by the Holy Spirit and given faith to believe. Who can undo the Spirit's work and not be more sovereign than Him at the same time? And all of this is because of GRACE. Nothing in there has anything to do with your own merit. Nothing at all.
Roman Catholicisim teaches that salvation is by grace alone but not by faith alone. They too believe that salvation is by the finished work of Christ and even claim, as you do, that it is SOLELY by that work. However, they add just as you do, if the believer does not produce fruit, good works, then they may not be saved after all.


Royston’s

Yes, a true believer will bear fruits, and certainly will not lose his salvation, but that is not the issue. The issue lies with you (Ivan) saying people who are not bearing fruits will lose their salvation. Scripturally incorrect as indicated in Lk 12:46-48.

I have no qualms with the issue of wilful sinning leading to eternal damnation... [but] not bearing fruits cannot be equated that this person is living a life of wilful sinning as a believer. Living in sin is denying Christ as Lord and Saviour. Wilful sinning starts first with the believer not wanting to stay rooted in Christ. This believer will cease to be in Christ, because he himself took himself out of Christ.

(Para 2 admits that believers can lose their salvation. Hence Royston’s stand is different from Chris’ stand)


Truelight’s

…. [there] are actually SAINTS who has given up their positions as SAINTS by choosing not to abide in Christ (John 15:6)."

A true Christian will bear fruit and thus will not lose his salvation.

The difference is our understanding of "true Christian". Many can call themselves Christians but what constitute a true Christian? Can someone who, repent before, attend church every sunday but not obeying the commandments(baptise, preaching the gospel, repent everytime he sin etc) of God, living a worldly life, be consider a true Christian?

(Para 1 suggests that Truelight’s stand is the same as Royston’s)



In summary,

Chris’ stand is “once saved, always saved”.

Ivan/Royston/Truelight’s stand is that it is possible for a believer to lose his salvation.

Ivan believes that a true believer will definitely bear fruit. Truelight agrees with this. Royston also believes this. I believe Chris will disagree with this.

Royston doesn’t agree with Ivan that if you see a believer not bearing fruit, then you can conclude that he will lose his salvation.

Next-in-Thread Next Message

Add Message to: "Salvation & works"

Members Subscribe Admin Mode Show Frames Help for Agora Public 1.10

Messages Inline: 1 All Outline: 1 2 3

1. Question Thanks LBS, do you want to contribute and form your own conclusion,if any? eom. by Ivan, 2001, Oct 27
1. None My belief by LBS, 2001, Oct 27
1. Note Basing on gut feel or God's word by Ivan, 2001, Oct 28
2. Feedback Responding by LBS, 2001, Oct 29
1. Feedback Remain in Christ; beware of wrong teachings! by Ivan, 2001, Oct 29
2. Ok Faith + Works = Righteous by True Light, 2001, Oct 30
1. Ok You will not be burdened by works for the burden is on the Holy Spirit working in us; you are enlightened,TL. eom. by Ivan, 2001, Oct 30
2. Ok Faith = Righteousness + Works by Keith, 2001, Oct 30
1. Feedback Faith + Works = Righteousness? by Interested , 2001, Oct 30
1. Feedback Hey Keith and Royston, Are you in the mood for some Algebra? by Interested , 2001, Oct 30
2. Feedback Some clarifications by True Light, 2001, Oct 31
1. More Sorry! should be "counted" & not "accounted" righteous. EOM by True Light, 2001, Oct 31
2. None so does ivan believe faith+works = righteousness or faith = works = righteousness? eom by Royston Ong, 2001, Oct 31
1. Note To fine tune the equation of TL..... by Ivan, 2001, Oct 31
3. Pray Hi TL by Royston Ong, 2001, Nov 01
1. Ok Formula not truly represent our belief by True Light, 2001, Nov 01
1. Agree Yes, True Light, we are in agreement on this area........ by Ivan, 2001, Nov 01
(_ None Agree! EOM by True Light, 2001, Nov 01
2. None I understand, but i need to clarify as you gave Keith another equation Faith = Works = Righteousness. Do you still hold by Royston Ong, 2001, Nov 05
3. More Explanatory note: the formula is meant to be read as: Faith in Christ produces Righteousness and Good Works in us. eom. by Keith, 2001, Oct 30
3. Feedback Hi Ivan, Do me a favour first by LBS, 2001, Oct 30
4. None Hi Truelight, Do me a favour first by LBS, 2001, Oct 30
1. Note The works of the Law or the works of obedience? by Ivan, 2001, Oct 31
1. Agree Thanks for defining "works" in Roman. by True Light, 2001, Oct 31
(_ None Ivan's definition is Living Faith = faith+obedient works = righteousness ....is it then different from your definition? by Royston Ong, 2001, Oct 31
2. Ok What is faith? by True Light, 2001, Oct 31
3. None Ivan, Truelight, Need your help to understand by LBS, 2001, Oct 31
1. Question Hi LBS, To answer you, I need to ask you a question....... by Ivan, 2001, Oct 31
2. Ok Grace, Faith & Believe by True Light, 2001, Nov 01
3. None Ivan, Truelight, Haven't got a satisfactory reply yet by LBS, 2001, Nov 01
1. Feedback On true Christian by Ivan, 2001, Nov 01
1. Feedback My concern: are we believing/preaching the right gospel by LBS, 2001, Nov 02
1. Feedback Hi LBS by Ivan, 2001, Nov 02
2. Question 2 questions by True Light, 2001, Nov 03
1. Feedback Reply by LBS, 2001, Nov 03
2. Feedback Don't think can help you. by True Light, 2001, Nov 01
1. Feedback Haven't changed topic, still on salvation&works by LBS, 2001, Nov 03
4. Idea common ground: we are all saved in Christ by Keith, 2001, Nov 02
1. Feedback A matter of life and death by LBS, 2001, Nov 02
(_ Feedback I have to explain further because you believe in an empty faith. by True Light, 2001, Nov 03
(_ Feedback Faith is believing what God ask you to believe by LBS, 2001, Nov 03
1. Feedback Hi LBS by Royston Ong, 2001, Nov 04
1. None But we must be consistent by LBS, 2001, Nov 04
(_ Feedback The mysteries of Abide in me, AND I in you by Royston Ong, 2001, Nov 05
1. None To further add by Royston Ong, 2001, Nov 05
1. None Hence, nothing about works comes into play, but it follows the same train of thought as by Royston Ong, 2001, Nov 05
(_ Agree Fully agree with you on this. by Keith, 2001, Nov 05
1. Ok Maths class by True Light, 2001, Nov 05
1. Feedback Actually, TL. I am afraid it is not at all close to a summation rule, as proposed by both Ivan and yourself eom by Royston Ong, 2001, Nov 06
2. Feedback Hi TL by Keith, 2001, Nov 06
1. Ok I like your explanation on the baby christian equation. by True Light, 2001, Nov 06
(_ Ok On baby christians and balanced teachings by Keith, 2001, Nov 07
1. Ok You are right! different approach. by True Light, 2001, Nov 07
1. Feedback True believer? by Keith, 2001, Nov 08
(_ None Thanks. EOM by True Light, 2001, Nov 08
2. Ok Yah yah, am certainly moving along the same wavelength as you are by Royston Ong, 2001, Nov 08
2. Ok Go ahead, if it helps to make things clearer for all. by Royston Ong, 2001, Nov 05
2. None Still see inconsistencies regarding Jn 15:1-8 by LBS, 2001, Nov 06
1. Sad What kind of "once saved always saved" do you believe?. by True Light, 2001, Nov 07
1. None Please see post "Recap" by LBS, 2001, Nov 09
2. Feedback TL and SBG are unable to see past it, does not mean they totally disagree by Royston Ong, 2001, Nov 08
1. None Confounded by LBS, 2001, Nov 09
1. Feedback Am a little tired as I reply this.... by Royston Ong, 2001, Nov 10
1. Note Understand you are tired by LBS, 2001, Nov 11
2. Feedback Please re-read my earlier posting to you.... by Royston Ong, 2001, Nov 10
2. Feedback I twist verses? by True Light, 2001, Nov 04
1. None You didn't read me post properly by LBS, 2001, Nov 05
(_ Feedback Re-post by True Light, 2001, Nov 05
(_ Feedback I haven't changed my belief! by LBS, 2001, Nov 05
(_ Feedback Your answer not clear by True Light, 2001, Nov 05
(_ None Please see post "Recap" by LBS, 2001, Nov 09
4. None Recap by LBS, 2001, Nov 09
1. Ok Please reconsider by Ivan, 2001, Nov 10
1. News not exactly agree by Royston Ong, 2001, Nov 11
1. Ok We cannot hope to fully explain the Apostle James teaching on the 2 sides of the same coin (born-again heart)...... by Ivan, 2001, Nov 11
(_ Feedback if you say :"Like I said the resulting or subsequent works of obedience is a ..." by Royston Ong, 2001, Nov 12
(_ Ok We need to explain the equation by Ivan, 2001, Nov 13
2. Feedback The reason for this discussion by LBS, 2001, Nov 11
1. Ok Hi LBS by Ivan, 2001, Nov 11
1. Ok Amen! Ivan, I think you explained better. by True Light, 2001, Nov 11
(_ Agree You forgot the FMs & the Readers. Hehehe! eom by saved-by-grace, 2001, Nov 12
(_ Ok Oops! Errr! the FM & readers are represented by those dots. kekeke! EOM by True Light, 2001, Nov 12
2. Feedback Closing the gap in our understanding? by LBS, 2001, Nov 11
1. Feedback O gosh! The debate is going to repeat itself one more time? by saved-by-grace, 2001, Nov 12
2. Ok For your sake who is still on the milk of God's word and not ready for solid food, by Ivan, 2001, Nov 12
3. Feedback Wrapping up by LBS, 2001, Nov 17
1. Note In summing up, you are in a dangerous position if you continue in the carnal state, and not walk in the Spirit.... by Ivan, 2001, Nov 17
3. Question What gospel do you preach? by LBS, 2001, Oct 29
1. Ok The gospel I preached by True Light, 2001, Oct 29
2. Note The gospel based on 1 Cor 15:1-4.eom. by Ivan, 2001, Oct 29
2. Feedback Very well displayed LBS. by Royston Ong, 2001, Oct 27
3. Ok You are good, man! by True Light, 2001, Oct 28
4. Feedback To Royston, A major diffrence between the Arminians and Calvinists. by Interested , 2001, Oct 31
1. Feedback Yup understand what you mean by Royston Ong, 2001, Nov 11

Add Message to: "Salvation & works"

Members Subscribe Admin Mode Show Frames Help for Agora Public 1.10
FOOTER for MessageBoard II

tell your friends

Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998,1999, 2000, 2001 Antioch Networks International. All Rights Reserved.
The Agora Forum is a registered trademark of Antioch Networks International.

Thank you for contributing to MessageBoard!

Back to Antioch's Home Page
For more information, please send your request to: forumaster@antioch.com.sg.