Agora Messageboard now functions as a quorum. Please click
to join as a member. We want to hear from you... A query that needs an answer,
a word to uplift the people, a statement of concern that needs prayer, a cry
for help...
God bless you...
Previous Messageboard have been archived.
|
YOU:
"
ME: "Once you have determined the worthiness or unworthiness" - how does this happen?
For you, it seems to me that you are content in accepting a secondary source of information. You are not at all concerned that you have just been given a packaged opinion which you simply replay over and over again here. " JD: My question to you is, do we always have to taste things for ourselves in order to know if it good or bad ? You seem to say that to know that HP is wrong, we have to first taste it ??? If this is the case, Do I have to know that drugs or pre-marital sex is bad, I have to try it first ?? I hope you are not saying or meaning this. I think Imay have mis-understood you. But If you are indeed saying this, then there is no need for teachers and critics to be around or even the Holy Spirit. You see, somethings, we are not to TOUCH at all. There are things we cannot say " Let me try and read it first or taste it first or ..etc then I will be convinced".... That is the mistake Adam & Eve did..... -JD.
|
Messages
Outline:
Untitled by bluemarcus, 2001, Dec 14
Yes, you don't ALWAYS have to, but sometimes you DO. by Christopher Yip, 2001, Dec 14