HEADER FOR MessageBoard
(Click picture to go back to Table of Contents)

Welcome

This Messageboard will be shut soon. Please go to New Messageboard to continue your discussions.
We want to hear from you... A query that needs an answer, a word to uplift the people, a statement of concern that needs prayer, a cry for help...

God bless you...   tell your friends

Next-in-Thread Next Message Previous Message Next Thread

Feedback: Cannot prove a negative

Forum: MessageBoard
Re: Scientist Finds Scientific Proof God Exists
Re: Warning God Almighty is beyond proof
Re: Question But what if...
Re: Feedback The problem is ..... (Interested )
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 01:04:51 GMT
From: Eveline How <luv_jazz@hotmail.com>

Dear Interested

Well, one thing I've learnt from the atheists is you cannot demand someone to prove a negative, e.g. prove that God does NOT exist. I mean, we can ask this question but they'll throw back at you with additional questions such as "prove that pink unicorns/leprechauns/etc do not exist."

The ball is thrown back into the Christian's court to prove that pink unicorns do not exist. I usually can't be bothered with wasting my time playing ping pong with them. So I'll concede that perhaps pink unicorns DO exist. I mean, who knows right? There's talk that perhaps dinosaurs are still roaming in the deep forests of the Amazon. Our world is so small and we're not omniscient. So who knows, perhaps pink unicorns really do exist.

(Maybe read too much CS Lewis, hee hee.)

No, I usually avoid "negative" hypothesis like this but if I get asked, I'll just point out that the problem is for the atheist or the doubter, not for me. Some things I have been convinced (e.g. existence of God), some I am still open (e.g. pink unicorns). Quite simply, it's your problem so don't ask me to solve it for you!

-eveline

Next-in-Thread Next Message Previous Message Next Thread

Messages Inline: 1 All Outline: 1 2 3

4. Ok: the unicorn, Jewel, was blue, not pink i think...hehehehehe (n/t) by edmund, 11/15/00
3. Feedback: To Eveline and Seeker, On Pascal's Wager by Interested , 11/15/00
3. Question: Wager Approach Can or Not, Biblicly Speaking? by 'Santa' Monica, 11/15/00
1. Feedback: Personally by Eveline How, 11/16/00
2. Agree: OK Lor by 'Santa' Monica, 11/16/00
1. Feedback: To Eveline, On God's Laws by Interested , 11/16/00
2. Feedback: Yes, probabilistic by Eveline How, 11/15/00
1. Feedback: To Eveline, by Interested , 11/15/00
-> Feedback: Reply on a small matter by Eveline How, 11/16/00
-> Feedback: Yes Eveline, you've got it! by Interested , 11/16/00
-> Feedback: One major flaw, To Eveline by Interested , 11/16/00
-> Feedback: On the Pascal's paper, To Eveline by Interested , 11/17/00
1. Feedback: Absolutely spot on Interested! by edmund, 11/15/00
1. Feedback: Hullo Edmund, by Interested, 11/15/00
-> None: Hi Interested by edmund, 11/15/00
-> Feedback: To Edmund, by Interested, 11/16/00
2. Feedback: Quick reply to Eveline, by Interested , 11/14/00
1. None: Pink unicorns?!?!? by Sen, 11/14/00

to: "Cannot prove a negative"

Move/Remove Admin Mode Show Frames Help for Antioch Agora Forum
FOOTER for MessageBoard

tell your friends

Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998 Antioch Networks International. All Rights Reserved.
The Agora Forum is a registered trademark of Antioch Networks International.

Thank you for contributing to MessageBoard!

Back to Antioch's Home Page
For more information, please send your request to: forumaster@antioch.com.sg.