HEADER FOR MessageBoard
(Click picture to go back to Table of Contents)

Welcome

This Messageboard will be shut soon. Please go to New Messageboard to continue your discussions.
We want to hear from you... A query that needs an answer, a word to uplift the people, a statement of concern that needs prayer, a cry for help...

God bless you...   tell your friends

Next-in-Thread Next Message Previous Message Next Thread

Feedback: To Eveline and Seeker, On Pascal's Wager

Forum: MessageBoard
Re: Scientist Finds Scientific Proof God Exists
Re: Warning God Almighty is beyond proof
Re: Question But what if...
Re: Feedback The problem is ..... (Interested )
Re: Feedback Cannot prove a negative (Eveline How)
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 05:28:55 GMT
From: Interested <unknown>

Dear Lady and Gentleman,

It seems to me that it is far more important to absolutely satisfy ourselves that there is no God if we choose to be atheists. Those who believe in God will loose nothing if it turns out that there is no God after all at the end of this life but those who are atheists will have an eternity of darkness to worry about if there is a God. So it is once again a question in Probability.

I don't believe there is a deterministic method to prove whether there is a God or not. Even the Bible says it is by faith that we know Him which implies that there is no deterministic method to prove the existence or non-existence of God. But God has left sufficient evidence of Himself for all to see in Creation and no one will have any excuse on the Day of Judgement, so says the Bible. In my opinion, Creation is an even greater witness to the wisdom, power, glory and majesty of God for even the Bible appeals to it. The heavens declare the glory of God and His invisible attributes are clearly seen in the things which He has made, says the Bible.

If you are interested I think the following website may be worth looking into. I haven't actually gone through it but I roughly know what it is about. Because of our finite and limited intellectual capacities we have to resort to Probabilistic thinking. I'll read it later. Too many things to read.

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pascal-wager/

Take care and Bye Bye:-

Next-in-Thread Next Message Previous Message Next Thread

Messages Inline: 1 All Outline: 1 2 3

3. Question: Wager Approach Can or Not, Biblicly Speaking? by 'Santa' Monica, 11/15/00
1. Feedback: Personally by Eveline How, 11/16/00
2. Agree: OK Lor by 'Santa' Monica, 11/16/00
1. Feedback: To Eveline, On God's Laws by Interested , 11/16/00
2. Feedback: Yes, probabilistic by Eveline How, 11/15/00
1. Feedback: To Eveline, by Interested , 11/15/00
-> Feedback: Reply on a small matter by Eveline How, 11/16/00
-> Feedback: Yes Eveline, you've got it! by Interested , 11/16/00
-> Feedback: One major flaw, To Eveline by Interested , 11/16/00
-> Feedback: On the Pascal's paper, To Eveline by Interested , 11/17/00
1. Feedback: Absolutely spot on Interested! by edmund, 11/15/00
1. Feedback: Hullo Edmund, by Interested, 11/15/00
-> None: Hi Interested by edmund, 11/15/00
-> Feedback: To Edmund, by Interested, 11/16/00

to: "To Eveline and Seeker, On Pascal's Wager"

Move/Remove Admin Mode Show Frames Help for Antioch Agora Forum
FOOTER for MessageBoard

tell your friends

Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998 Antioch Networks International. All Rights Reserved.
The Agora Forum is a registered trademark of Antioch Networks International.

Thank you for contributing to MessageBoard!

Back to Antioch's Home Page
For more information, please send your request to: forumaster@antioch.com.sg.